The Golden State is nearing the legalization of internet poker. A crucial legislative body strongly endorsed bill AB 2863, intended to finally introduce regulated virtual poker to California.
Nevertheless, the path is not without obstacles. Although the legislation progressed easily through the committee phase, certain indigenous groups are expressing firm disapproval. They contend that entities such as PokerStars, which did not halt operations within the United States after the 2006 Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, should be prohibited from benefiting from a controlled market.
These groups perceive these businesses as “wrongdoers” and believe their previous conduct should preclude them. The present legislation does not specifically forbid these companies, which is a significant point of contention.
Intriguingly, PokerStars has been actively seeking entry into the Californian market for a considerable period. In 2014, they collaborated with numerous tribes and card rooms to advocate for legalization, aiming to secure a share if and when online poker receives approval.
This latest event revitalizes the protracted battle to legalize online poker in California. While the bill still faces challenges, it signifies substantial advancement and provides a ray of hope for poker aficionados within the state.
Legislator Adam Gray, the key proponent behind legislation AB 2863, has put forth new legislation. This recent endeavor is a joint effort between Gray and Legislator Reginald Jones-Sawyer, who also presented an internet poker proposal last year, AB 167.
Contrary to the previous year’s endeavor, this legislation delves into the specifics and establishes precise regulatory wording.
The legislation, AB 2863, suggests that the initial $60 million in earnings generated annually would be allocated to California’s equine racing sector. The lawful age for involvement would be 21.
“Following numerous modifications and discussions with stakeholders and consumer representatives, two significant concerns were brought up by the opposition: equine racing and eligibility,” remarked Gray. “Currently, we are presenting language that tackles equine racing, while discussions on eligibility are continuing.”
The legislation will now return to the Assembly Appropriations Committee and requires a supermajority vote to proceed to the Senate.
admin